Skip to content

Conversation

pitaj
Copy link
Contributor

@pitaj pitaj commented Sep 7, 2025

Based on #128666

This PR exists to test the perf effects of adding a new intrinsic, like ub_checks, for overflow checks. Tests are expected to fail.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 7, 2025

r? @jhpratt

rustbot has assigned @jhpratt.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 7, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 7, 2025

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri interpreter

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

This PR changes rustc_public

cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @ouz-a

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

Some changes occurred to constck

cc @fee1-dead

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred to the intrinsics. Make sure the CTFE / Miri interpreter
gets adapted for the changes, if necessary.

cc @rust-lang/miri, @RalfJung, @oli-obk, @lcnr

Some changes occurred to the CTFE machinery

cc @RalfJung, @oli-obk, @lcnr

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa

cc @WaffleLapkin

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

This PR changes MIR

cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @vakaras

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jhpratt jhpratt added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 7, 2025
@pitaj pitaj force-pushed the intrinsic-overflow_checks-trial branch from 3448d96 to 0cae867 Compare September 13, 2025 19:21
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 22, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #146683) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@pitaj pitaj force-pushed the intrinsic-overflow_checks-trial branch from 0cae867 to ddee69b Compare October 9, 2025 03:54
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@pitaj pitaj force-pushed the intrinsic-overflow_checks-trial branch from ddee69b to 47e50ab Compare October 9, 2025 05:10
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 9, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Oct 11, 2025

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Oct 11, 2025
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Oct 11, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 24bd8e0 (24bd8e0e6908f2b8a95a3e4f7d62346bbf1dbc2f, parent: 360a3a4e65cb70ea6e9da69cbb15f460dee516fd)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (24bd8e0): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.3%, secondary -1.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
9.4% [9.4%, 9.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.8% [-3.4%, -2.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.3% [-3.4%, 9.4%] 3

Cycles

Results (primary -2.3%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.7% [2.2%, 3.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.0% [-3.7%, -2.2%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1

Binary size

Results (primary -0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1

Bootstrap: 473.775s -> 474.275s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 388.16 MiB -> 388.18 MiB (0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Oct 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants